Domestic institutional investors’ integration with Nifty 50 in the Indian equity market
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(3).2025.14
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #3, pp. 175-183
- 9 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) have traditionally dominated the Indian equity markets. However, since 2020, the landscape has significantly transformed as the registered investor base at the National Stock Exchange, India, has tripled. This phenomenon is driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and the rise of ‘influencers’ or easy access to financial knowledge. This study investigates the long-term and causative relationship between the Nifty 50 index and the net flows of domestic institutional investors (DIIs) in the Indian stock market, using daily data from April 2017 to March 2022. Employing the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test, Johansen cointegration tests, and Granger causality analysis, the findings reveal a long-term cointegrated relationship between the Nifty 50 and DIIs’ daily flow, both before and after COVID-19. The results reveal a bidirectional Granger causality between the Nifty 50 and DIIs (p-value < 0.02) and NIFTY 50 and FIIs (p-value < 0.00) in the post-COVID era, a shift from the unidirectional pattern observed pre-COVID between NIFTY 50 and DIIs. This indicates that traders and analysts may use DII flows as a leading indicator for NIFTY 50 movements. Studying DII’s interaction with the Nifty 50 index helps assess whether their investment patterns drive market movements or are reactive to them and highlights the resilience of Indian markets to external shocks.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, G23, G14
-
References43
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Results of descriptive statistics (pre-COVID)
- Table 2. Results of descriptive statistics (post-COVID)
- Table 3. ADF test results
- Table 4. Johansen cointegration test results
- Table 5. Granger causality test results
-
- Adhikary, A., Bora, B., & Kumar, J. (2015). Mutual Fund Performance and Investor’s Perception: An Indian Perspective. In Banking, Finance, and Accounting: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 614-624). IGI Global.
- Agarwal, B. (2016). FII Inflows into Indian IPOs and its Impact on the Indian Stock Market. Emerging Economy Studies, 2(1), 129-144.
- Aggarwal, V., Doifode, A., & Tiwary, M. K. (2022). Do lower foreign flows and higher domestic flows reduce Indian equity market volatility? Vision, 26(4), 461-470.
- Bao Dinh, N., & Tran, V. N. H. (2024). Institutional Ownership and Stock Liquidity: Evidence From an Emerging Market. SAGE Open, 14(1), 21582440241239116.
- Barakat, M. R., Elgazzar, S. H., & Hanafy, K. M. (2016). Impact of macroeconomic variables on stock markets: Evidence from emerging markets. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(1), 195-207.
- Bhatia, A., Chandani, A., Divekar, R., Mehta, M., & Vijay, N. (2022). Digital innovation in wealth management landscape: the moderating role of robo advisors in behavioural biases and investment decision-making. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(3/4), 693-712.
- Budiarso, N. S., Hasyim, A. W., Soleman, R., Zam, I. Z., & Pontoh, W. (2020). Investor behavior under the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(3), 308-318.
- Can Ergün, Z., Cagli, E. C., & Durukan Salı, M. B. (2023). The interconnectedness across risk appetite of distinct investor types in Borsa Istanbul. Studies in Economics and Finance, 40(3), 425-444.
- Cem Şahin, B. (2024). Momentum trading: How it differs among investor segments. Investment Analysts Journal, 1-14.
- Chan, K., Menkveld, A. J., & Yang, Z. (2007). The informativeness of domestic and foreign investors’ stock trades: Evidence from the perfectly segmented Chinese market. Journal of Financial Markets, 10(4), 391-415.
- Chandra, A. (2012). Cause and effect between FII trading behaviour and stock market returns: The Indian experience. Journal of Indian Business Research, 4(4), 286-300.
- Chaudhuri, K., & Smiles, S. (2004). Stock market and aggregate economic activity: evidence from Australia. Applied Financial Economics, 14(2), 121-129.
- Chauhan, S. (2013). Impact of foreign capital inflows on Indian stock market. TRANS Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research (TAJMMR), 2(3 and 4), 79-90.
- Chauhan, Y., Mishra, A. K., & Parikh, B. (2023). Fund family versus mutual fund performance: evidence from the Indian investors’ perspective. Journal of Asset Management, 24(4), 268-283.
- Choudhary, K., Singh, P., & Soni, A. (2022). Relationship between FIIs’ herding and returns in the Indian equity market: Further empirical evidence. Global Business Review, 23(1), 137-155.
- Cookson, G., Jenkinson, T., Jones, H., & Martinez, J. V. (2021). Best buys and own brands: investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual funds. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(1), 227-263.
- Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431.
- Eliwa, Y., & Elmaghrabi, M. E. (2025). Investment Horizons and ESG Decoupling: Distinct Roles of Long-Term and Short-Term Institutional Investors. Economics Letters, 112207.
- Fifield, S. G., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2002). Macroeconomic factors and share returns: an analysis using emerging market data. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 7(1), 51-62.
- Guo, X., Gu, C., Zhang, C., & Li, S. (2024). Institutional herding and investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Markets, 100891.
- Hamao, Y., & Mei, J. (2001). Living with the “enemy”: an analysis of foreign investment in the Japanese equity market. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(5), 715-735.
- Han, H. (2023). Does increasing the QFII quota promote Chinese institutional investors to drive ESG? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 30(6), 1627-1643.
- Hong, Y., Jiang, Y., Su, X., & Deng, C. (2024). Extreme state media reporting and the extreme stock market during COVID-19: A multi-quantile VaR Granger causality approach in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102143.
- Li, G., Ren, K., Qiao, Y., & Wu, B. (2024). From framing to priming: How does media coverage promote ESG preferences of institutional investors. Emerging Markets Review, 63, 101220.
- Loang, O. K. (2025). Can machine learning surpass human investors? Evidence from adaptive herding behaviour in US, China and India. Journal of Applied Economics, 28(1), 2435796.
- Luo, D., Jiang, S., & Yao, Z. (2023). Economic policy uncertainty and mutual fund risk shifting. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101921.
- Matha, R., Geetha, E., & Kumar, S. (2022). Dynamic relationship between equity, bond, commodity, forex and foreign institutional investments: Evidence from India. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(4), 65.
- Mukherjee, P., & Tiwari, S. (2022). Trading behaviour of foreign institutional investors: Evidence from Indian stock markets. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29(4), 605-629.
- Nittayagasetwat, A., & Buranasiri, J. (2022). International Fund Flows and Anomalies in Asian Stock Markets. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 12(3), 194-211.
- Pearce, D. K., & Roley, V. V. (1983). The reaction of stock prices to unanticipated changes in money: A note. The Journal of Finance, 38(4), 1323-1333.
- Rogalski, R. J., & Vinso, J. D. (1977). Stock returns, money supply and the direction of causality. The Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1017-1030.
- Ryu, D., Webb, R. I., & Yu, J. (2022). Funding liquidity shocks and market liquidity providers. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102734.
- Saxena, S., & Sikdar, C. (2024). Domestic institutional investments in India: an empirical analysis of dynamic interactions with stock market returns and volatility. Global Business and Economics Review, 31(2), 230-258.
- Singh, D., Fida, B., Anand, S., & Dalwai, T. (2024). Investors’ Intent to Invest in Stock Market: An Exploratory Post-COVID Study for Oman. In The AI Revolution: Driving Business Innovation and Research: Volume 1 (pp. 367-379). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Sivaramakrishnan, S., Srivastava, M., & Rastogi, A. (2017). Attitudinal factors, financial literacy, and stock market participation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(5), 818-841.
- Stephens, C. R., Benink, H. A., Gordillo, J. L., & Pardo-Guerra, J. P. (2021). A New Measure of Market Inefficiency. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(6), 263.
- Subagyo, H., Hersugondo, H., Candra, W. M., Batu, K. L., & Waluyo, D. E. (2024). Foreign investor portfolio flow and monetary policy response in the Indonesian stock market considering the COVID-19 pandemic. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(1), 88-97.
- Tauni, M. Z., Rao, Z. U. R., Fang, H., Mirza, S. S., Memon, Z. A., & Jebran, K. (2017). Do investor’s Big Five personality traits influence the association between information acquisition and stock trading behavior? China Finance Review International, 7(4), 450-477.
- Tutuncu, L. (2023). The changing investor demographics of an emerging IPO market during the COVID-19 pandemic. China Finance Review International, 13(3), 342-361.
- Vishnani, S., Singh, N., & Srivastava, A. (2024). Understanding Mutual Fund Investors’ Behaviour Using an Extended Model of Goal-directed Behaviour. Global Business Review, 09721509241224020.
- Willem van Gelder, J., German, L., & Bailis, R. (2012). Biofuels investments in tropical forest-rich countries: implications for responsible finance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(2), 134-160.
- Yoo, J. W., & Chang, Y. J. (2024). Domestic vs. Foreign Institutional Investors: Who Improves ESG and Value of Chinese Companies? Sustainability, 16(18), 8238.
- Zou, J., Zhong, X., Gong, C., & Lu, X. (2025). Examining institutional investor preferences: The influence of ESG ratings on stock holding in China’s stock market. Research in International Business and Finance, 73, 102609.