The mediating effects of work motivation and organizational support on the relationship between knowledge management and environmental law knowledge in Vietnamese commercial banks
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(1).2026.04
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2026, Issue #1, pp. 40-53
- 15 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
This study examines whether knowledge management practices in commercial banks influence employees’ knowledge of environmental law, providing empirical evidence from Vietnam’s banking sector as an emerging Asian economy. Data were collected from 568 employees across 35 Vietnamese commercial banks in the first quarter of 2025, and the hypotheses were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that all three knowledge management components (information-sharing systems, a learning-oriented organizational culture, and training and skill development) have positive effects on both work motivation and perceived organizational support. Information-sharing systems exert a strong influence on organizational support (β = 0.188) and work motivation (β = 0.207), while a learning-oriented culture significantly enhances organizational support (β = 0.204) and work motivation (β = 0.165). Training and skill development show the strongest effects on work motivation (β = 0.240) and organizational support (β = 0.185). In turn, work motivation and organizational support directly and positively affect employees’ environmental law knowledge (β = 0.343 and β = 0.363, respectively). Moreover, both variables significantly mediate the relationships between KM components and environmental law knowledge. These findings underscore the relevance of social exchange theory in explaining how effective knowledge management practices enhance employees’ legal knowledge, thereby contributing to more sustainable organizational development. Accordingly, practical implications are proposed for bank managers to strengthen knowledge management implementation.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the Editor-in Chief and a reviewer for their helpful comments that in our view have helped to improve the quality of the manuscript significantly. Beside, this study is the result of collaboration between researchers from the University of Law, Hue University, and School of Business and Economics, Duy Tan University. The authors would like to thank both institutions for their support and facilitation in the publication of this research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M12, M54, J21, K32
-
References39
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model and hypotheses
- Figure 2. Results of testing the PLS-SEM structural model
-
- Table 1. Measurement scales
- Table 2. Demographics of participants
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics, construct reliability, and validity
- Table 4. Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio
- Table 5. Results of structural model evaluation
- Table 6. Tests of hypotheses
-
- Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 25(1), 107-136.
- Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99-118.
- AlQahtani, S. (2024). The Relationship Between Knowledge of Environmental Law and Its Impact on Commitment to Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 1771-1787.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
- Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. (2017). Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen’S Theory of Planned Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 627-641.
- Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A Conceptual Model for Organizational Citizenship Behavior Directed Toward the Environment. Business & Society, 48(2), 243-256.
- Dalkir, K. (2013). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. In Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. CRC Press.
- Donate, M. J., & de Pablo, J. D. S. (2015). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 360-370.
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
- Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
- Flannery, B. L., & May, D. R. (2017). Environmental Ethical Decision Making in the U.S. Metal-Finishing Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 642-662.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
- Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2000). An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 235-261.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Kashef, S. M. (2023). A Scrutiny of the Role of Knowledge Management in Employees’ Organizational Culture, Motivation, and Success. IntechOpen.
- Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Spender, J. C., & Vanhala, M. (2014). The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(3), 362-375.
- King, W. R. (Ed.) (2009). Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Boston, MA: Springer.
- Lamola, A. A., & Yamane, T. (1967). Sensitized photodimerization of thymine in DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 58(2), 443-446.
- Law, M. M. S., Hills, P., & Hau, B. C. H. (2017). Engaging Employees in Sustainable Development - a Case Study of Environmental Education and Awareness Training in Hong Kong. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 84-97.
- Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
- Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the Value of an Organization’s Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151.
- Najeeb, M. M., Hanif, M. I., & Hamid, A. B. A. (2018). The impact of Knowledge Management (KM) and Organizational Commitment (OC) on employee job satisfaction (EJS) in banking sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Management Excellence, 11(1), 1476-1491.
- Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development. McGraw-Hill.
- Nonaka, I. (2009). The Knowledge-Creating Company. In Siesfeld, T., Cefola, J., & Neef, D. (Eds.), The economic impact of knowledge. Taylor and Francis.
- Ramus, C. A. (2001). Organizational support for employees: Encouraging creative ideas for environmental sustainability. California Management Review, 43(3), 85-105.
- Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698.
- Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2021). Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825-836.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol 2). John Wiley & Sons.
- Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239-1251.
- Tharenou, P., Saks, A. M., & Moore, C. (2007). A review and critique of research on training and organizational-level outcomes. Human Resource Management Review, 17(3), 251-273.
- Tuyen, B. Q. (2021). Building a Learning Organization in the Digital Era: A Proposed Model for Vietnamese Enterprises. International Review of Management and Marketing, 11(3), 42-48.
- Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
- Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
- Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 616.


