Breaking the glass ceiling in Kazakhstani science: Government grants and gender representation trends
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(1).2026.05
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2026, Issue #1, pp. 54-65
- 15 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Equal participation in scientific activity is an important indicator of the fair distribution of opportunities in a democratic society. This article examines the issue of women’s representation as leaders in Kazakhstani science, with a particular focus on the gender aspect of participation in scientific projects. For this purpose, the study analyzed the distribution of grants for scientific projects funded by the government between 2018 and 2024 in Kazakhstan. The findings show a positive trend in women’s participation in project leadership over the period analyzed, with the share of projects led by women increasing from 38.2% in 2018 to 48.4% in 2022, noting that most projects are funded for three years. At the same time, the analysis reveals pronounced disciplinary disparities. Women are most strongly represented in the social sciences and humanities, while their participation remains considerably lower in technical and natural science fields. The results also indicate a persistent gender gap in access to large-scale funding, as projects with higher budget allocations are predominantly led by male researchers. Overall, the results highlight both quantitative progress and structural limitations, underscoring the need for targeted policy measures aimed not only at increasing women’s participation but also at reducing gender imbalances across scientific fields and funding levels in Kazakhstani science.
Acknowledgments
The research presented in this paper was funded by the Science Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan under grant No. AP22784063 “Strategic Directions of Women’s Empowerment and Access to Quality Employment in Kazakhstan”.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I24, I23, J71
-
References39
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Number of researchers in Kazakhstan from 2006 to 2022
-
- Table 1. Number of applications submitted and approved
- Table 2. Members of the National Scientific Council by gender, including the chair and deputy chair (2019–2023)
- Table 3. Kazakhstan’s awards in the scientific field from 2018 to 2024
-
- Agabekova, Z., Salimzhanova, A., Suleimenova, Z., & Yestekova, G. (2025). Gender Perspectives in Higher Education: Enhancing Gender Studies in Kazakhstan. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 16(1), 88-137.
- Aksit, E., & Salimzhanova A. (2024). Current issues on gender studies education in Kazakhstan. Bulletin of Kazakh National Women’s Teacher Training University, 1, 23-34.
- Aufenvenne, P., Haase, C., & Steinbrink, M. (2024). The Gender Citation Gap in Human Geography: Indications from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Professional Geographer, 76(1), 48-60.
- Ayyala, M. S., Skarupski, K., Bodurtha, J. N., González-Fernández, M., Ishii, L. E., Fivush, B., & Levine, R. B. (2019). Mentorship Is Not Enough: Exploring Sponsorship and Its Role in Career Advancement in Academic Medicine. Academic Medicine, 94(1), 94-100.
- Blommaert, L., & van den Brink, M. (2020). Gender Equality in Appointments of Board Members: The Role of Multiple Actors and their Dynamics. European Management Review, 17(3), 633-647.
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNSRK) (2021). Ratio of women and men with a degree, by branches of science.
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNSRK). (2022). Ratio of women/men by number of specialist researchers.
- Coleman, M. (2010). Women-only (homophilous) networks supporting women leaders in education. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(6), 769-781.
- Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. L. (2018). Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields. Political Analysis, 26(3), 312-327.
- Eizmendi-Iraola, M., & Peña-Fernández, S. (2023). Gender Stereotypes Make Women Invisible: The Presence of Female Scientists in the Media. Social Sciences, 12(1).
- EU. (2024) She figures. Gender in research and innovation: statistics and indicators. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Greguletz, E., Diehl, M.-R., & Kreutzer, K. (2019). Why women build less effective networks than men: The role of structural exclusion and personal hesitation. Human Relations, 72(7), 1234-1261.
- Kazakhstan Institute for Public Development (KIPD). (2024). Vysshee obrazovanie v Kazahstane:dostizheniya i perspektivy rosta. [Higher education in Kazakhstan: achievements and prospects for growth]. (In Russian).
- Kenzheali, Y., Kenzhegulova, G., Kireyeva, A., & Ainakul, N. (2024). Assessing gender differences in managerial roles, wages, education, and soft skills in Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 341-357.
- Khamzina, Z., Buribayev, Y., Yermukanov, Y., & Alshurazova, A. (2020). Is it possible to achieve gender equality in Kazakhstan: Focus on employment and social protection. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 1-16.
- Kireyeva, A. A., & Olzhebayeva, G. S. (2023). Gender Imbalance in Science: Analytical Overview and Best Global Practices. Economy: Strategy and Practice, 18(4), 7-21. (In Kazakh).
- Kuzhabekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2017). Female academic leadership in the post-Soviet context. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2-3), 183-199.
- Kuzhabekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2021). Women’s progression through the leadership pipeline in the universities of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Compare, 51(1), 99-117.
- Kuzhabekova, A., Janenova, S., & Almukhambetova, A. (2018). Analysing the Experiences of Female Leaders in Civil Service in Kazakhstan: Trapped between Economic Pressure to Earn and Traditional Family Role Expectations. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(15), 1290-1301.
- Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2016). Kontseptsiya semeynoy i gendernoy politiki v Respublike Kazakhstan do 2030 goda [The Concept of Family and Gender Policy in the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2030] (CFGPRK). (In Russian).
- Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2023). Kontseptsiya razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya i nauki v Respublike Kazakhstan na 2023–2029 gody [The Concept of Development of Higher Education and Science in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2023–2029 years] (CDHESRC). (In Russian).
- Lerman, K., Yu, Y., Morstatter, F., & Pujara, J. (2022). Gendered citation patterns among the scientific elite. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 119(40).
- Medeuov, D., Rodionova, K., Sabitov, Z., & Rodionov, A. (2025) Negotiating science funding: The interplay of merit, bias, and administrative discretion in grant allocation in Kazakhstan. PLoS One, 20(5), e0318875.
- National Center of Science and Technology Evaluation (NCSTE). (n.d. - a). Sistema menedzhmenta kachestva [Quality management system]. (In Russian).
- National Center of Science and Technology Evaluation (NCSTE). (n.d.- b). Decision of the NSC (Extracts).
- O’Connor, P., O’Hagan, C., Myers, E. S., Baisner, L., Apostolov, G., Topuzova, I., Saglamer, G., Tan, M. G., & Caglayan, H. (2020). Mentoring and sponsorship in higher education institutions: men’s invisible advantage in STEM? Higher Education Research and Development, 39(4), 764-777.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). Gender and development.
- Rodionov, A., Sabitov, Z., Gainous, J., Wagner, K. M., Bekmagambetov, A., & Rodionova, K. (2023). Economic Growth and the Feminisation of Political Science in Kazakhstan: A Leaky Pipeline? Europe-Asia Studies, 75(1), 110-130.
- Shakirova, S. M. (2022). Zhenskaia i gendernaia problematika v nauchnoi periodike Kazakhstana: kolichestvennyi analiz [Women’s and gender issues in Kazakh scientific periodicals: quantitative analysis]. (In Russian). Bulletin of Kazakh National Women’s Teacher Training University, 3, 17-34.
- Tchilinguirova, K., Belle, A. B., & Mahamud, G. (2024). Biases in gendered citation practices: an exploratory study and some reflections on the Matthew and Matilda effects.
- Temirbekova, Z., & Ergebekov, M. (2022). Gender zhane Kazahstan kogamy [Gender and Kazakhstani Society]. (In Kazakh). Almaty: Publishing House. P.300.
- United Nations (UN). (2015). The Beijing Declaration.
- United Nations (UN). (2025). Tsel’ 5: Obespecheniye gendernogo ravenstva i rasshireniye prav i vozmozhnostey vsekh zhenshchin i devochek [Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls]. (In Russian).
- United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2024). Public perception of gender equality and expansion of women’s rights and opportunities in Kazakhstan.
- Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2014). Gender in academic networking: The role of gatekeepers in professorial recruitment. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 460-492.
- Van Helden, D. L., den Dulk, L., Steijn, B., & Vernooij, M. W. (2023). Gender, networks and academic leadership: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(5), 1049-1066.
- Woehler, M. L., Cullen-Lester, K. L., Porter, C. M., & Frear, K. A. (2021). Whether, How, and Why Networks Influence Men’s and Women’s Career Success: Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 47(1), 207-236.
- World Trade Organization (WTO). (2025). Sustainable Development Goal on gender equality.
- Zhou, S., Chai, S., & Freeman, R. B. (2024). Gender homophily: In-group citation preferences and the gender disadvantage. Research Policy, 53(1), 104895.


