Does the dispute resolution mechanism influence investment trust in free trade zones? Insights from business managers in Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.09
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #3, pp. 113-129
- 25 Views
-
4 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study aims to examine and measure the impact of the dispute resolution mechanism (including its effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanism, government support, and the quality of the legal system) on trust in the investment environment within free trade zones (FTZs), as perceived by business managers. The data were gathered through a survey of 780 managers representing enterprises operating in 18 economic zones from October 2024 to February 2025 in Vietnam, a developing country in Southeast Asia. The results of the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis indicate that the dispute resolution mechanism influences trust in the investment climate within FTZs through the mediating roles of two key factors: trust in the dispute resolution mechanism and perceived risks in business management. Moreover, trust in the dispute resolution mechanism within FTZs is shaped by three factors, ranked in ascending order of positive impact: (1) quality of the legal system, (2) effectiveness of the dispute resolution mechanism, and (3) government support. Meanwhile, only the quality of the legal system has a statistically significant negative impact on the perception of business management risks. These findings underscore the need to enhance the legal framework governing FTZs, improve law enforcement mechanisms, strengthen investor protection, and support businesses in legal compliance. These challenges pose critical policy considerations for countries aiming to develop and implement the FTZs model effectively.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief and a reviewer for their helpful comments that in our view have helped to improve the quality of the manuscript significantly. Besides, this study is the result of collaboration between researchers from the School of Law, Hue University, and Duy Tan University. The authors would like to thank both institutions for their support and facilitation in the publication of this research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, M16, J52, K42
-
References49
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Model and hypotheses
- Figure 2. PLS-SEM structural model testing results
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics about the samples
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics, internal reliability and convergent reliability
- Table 3. HTMT coefficient between pairs of variables
- Table 4. Structural model evaluation results
- Table 5. Testing direct effect hypotheses
- Table 6. Test of indirect effect hypotheses
- Table A1. Measurement scale used in research
- Table A2. List of managers in 18 economic zones in Vietnam participating in the survey
-
- Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling Institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 949-995.
- Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2011). Contingent Credibility: The Impact of Investment Treaty Violations on Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization, 65(3), 401-432.
- Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2014). Evaluating Three Explanations for the Design of Bilateral Investment Treaties. World Politics, 66(1), 47-87.
- Busse, M., Königer, J., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2010). FDI promotion through bilateral investment treaties: More than a bit? Review of World Economics, 146(1), 147-177.
- Büthe, T., & Milner, H. V. (2014). Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Diversity in Trade Agreements: Credibility, Commitment, and Economic Flows in the Developing World, 1971-2007. World Politics, 66(1), 88-122.
- Chen, S., Huang, G., Zhang, H., Ye, Y., & Wu, Q. (2021). Do institutional risk preferences exist in Chinese direct investments in ASEAN countries? A case study of Chinese-funded enterprises in Laos. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 14(3), 306-324.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
- Dixit, A. K. (2004). Lawlessness and economics: Alternative modes of governance (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
- Dương, N. T., & Phương, Đ. N. H. (2021). Cơ chế giải quyết tranh chấp giữa nhà đầu tư và nhà nước theo quy địn [The investor–state dispute settlement mechanism in accordance with the Asean investment comprehensive agreement – the appropriateness and limitations with regional identity]. Journal of International Economics and Management, 37(2), 56-68. (In Vietnamese).
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Frick, S. A., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2023). What draws investment to special economic zones? Lessons from developing countries. Regional Studies, 57(11), 2136-2147.
- Gao, H. (2022). Trade and investment liberalization: the case of China (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Giroud, A., & Ivarsson, I. (2020). World Investment Report 2020: International production beyond the pandemic. Journal of International Business Policy, 3(4), 465-468.
- Gutierrez, O. R. (2017). An Analysis of the People’s Republic of China’s Foreign Investment Law and Foreign Direct Investment in Shanghai’s Free Trade Zone. Florida Journal of International Law, 29.
- Ha, T. (2024). Khu Thương mại tự do Đà Nẵng – mô hình đầu tiên của cả nước [What special mechanism will help Da Nang accelerate the development of the Da Nang Free Trade Zone – the first model in the country?]. (In Vietnamese).
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS–SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS–SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Hallward-Driemeier, M. (2003). Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract Foreign Direct Investment? only a bit and they could bite. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(1), 82-109.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Huyen, N. T., & Linh, N. T. (2023). Nâng cao hiệu quả giải quyết tranh chấp đầu tư quốc tế tại Việt Nam [Improving the effectiveness of resolving international investment disputes in Vietnam]. State Management Journal, 335, 34-38. (In Vietnamese).
- Jung, H. J., & Kim, E. M. (2020). International treaties and foreign direct investment: an empirical analysis of effects of bilateral investment treaties on South Korea’s FDI. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 25(3), 402-417.
- Kaufmann-Kohler, G., & Potestà, M. (2020). Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts. 117.
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues1. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220-246.
- Kox, H. L. M., & Rojas-Romagosa, H. (2020). How trade and investment agreements affect bilateral foreign direct investment: Results from a structural gravity model. The World Economy, 43(12), 3203-3242.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285-332.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113-1155.
- Langford, M., Behn, D., & Lie, R. H. (2017). The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Economic Law, 20(2), 301-332.
- Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 453-517.
- Lorenza, C., & Wargenegara, D. L. (2022). A Study On Real Estate Investment Decisions in an Indonesian Free Trade Zone: A Behavioral Finance Approach. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis: Jurnal Program Studi Akuntansi [Journal of Accountng and Business: Journal of the Accounting Study Program], 8(2), 164-180.
- Moiseienko, A., Reid, A., & Chase, I. (2022). Improving governance and tackling crime in free–trade zones.
- Mong, D. D., & Thanh, H. P. (2024). Impact of government support policies on firm performance of Vietnam’s small and medium tourism enterprises: The mediating role of competitive advantage. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(4), 498-511.
- Nakagawa, J. (2013). Transparency in international trade and investment dispute settlement. In Transparency in International Trade and Investment Dispute Settlement. Taylor and Francis.
- OECD. (2023). Best practices in investment promotion: An overview of regional state aid and special economic zones in Europe. In OECD Business and Finance Policy Papers. ECD Publishing.
- Puig, G. V., & Tai, S. L. T. (2017). China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Investor-State Dispute Settlement: An Uncertain Experiment. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 18(4), 673-711.
- Rahmonov, J. (2024). Investor-state dispute settlement in international public law: a critical assessment and future directions. Tamaddun Nuri Jurnali [Light of Civilization Magazine], 9(60), 430-432.
- Rana, A. T., & Kebewar, M. (2014). The Political Economy of FDI flows into Developing Countries: Does the depth of International Trade Agreements Matter? SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Sookhakich, P. (2019). Limits and Challenging Factors of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Light of China – ASEAN Free Trade Agreement Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Stähler, F. (2023). An optimal investor – state dispute settlement mechanism. Journal of Economics, 138(1), 1-16.
- Tams, C. J. (2014). Procedural Aspects of Investor–State Dispute Settlement: The Emergence of a European Approach? The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 15(3-4), 585-611.
- Tang, Z. (2022). A Study of China’s Arbitration System Based on a Review of International FTA Arbitration Mechanisms. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021), 631, 610-614.
- Theot Therith, C. (2022). Effect of Investment Promotion through the Special Economic Zone Mechanism on the Distribution of FDI in Cambodia. Economies, 10(9), 231.
- Van den Bossche, P. (2008). The law and policy of the World Trade Organization: text, cases and materials. Cambridge University Press.
- Xu, C. (2023). The impact of the Free Trade Zones establishment on the Corporate Risk–Taking level and its mechanism: Based on the empirical evidence of Chinese listed companies. Atlantis Highlights in Engineering, 20, 813-819.
- Yen, T. H., & Hoang, N. T. (2020). Procedural Transparency in the Settlement of Treaty–Based Investment Disputes in EVIPA and CPTPP. Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences, 2(1), 58-75.
- Ying, L. (2021). The Intellectual Property Protection System of the Foreign Investment Law: Basic Structure, Motivation and Game Logic. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2106.03467.
- Zeng, D. Z. (2021). The Past, Present, and Future of Special Economic Zones and Their Impact. Journal of International Economic Law, 24(2), 259-275.
- Zhao, J., & Hu, Y. (2016). Formal or informal? The dispute settlement mechanisms of China’s free trade agreements. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 21(1), 44-50.