Flexible work arrangements and their impact on women’s job satisfaction and quality of life: The mediating role of work-life balance
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.10
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #3, pp. 130-144
- 19 Views
-
4 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The study aims to examine the influence of flexible work arrangements (FWAs) on women’s job satisfaction, work-life balance, and quality of life, focusing on the mediating role of work-life balance and the moderating role of job demands. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted from March to November 2024 among women in domestic companies in Bengaluru, India. This study surveyed 592 women professionals from small- and medium-sized domestic firms across IT, finance, healthcare, retail, and service sectors. Respondents, engaged in flexible or hybrid work roles at various job levels, were selected for their direct experience with flexible schedules, making them well-positioned to assess impacts on job satisfaction, work-life balance, and quality of life. The results demonstrate that FWAs have significant direct effects on job satisfaction (β = 0.211, p < 0.001), work-life balance (β = 0.477, p < 0.001), and quality of life (β = 0.34, p < 0.001). Additionally, work-life balance positively influences both job satisfaction (β = 0.352, p < 0.001) and quality of life (β = 0.342, p < 0.001). Mediation analysis reveals that work-life balance partially mediates the relationships between FWAs and job satisfaction (β = 0.168, p < 0.001) as well as FWAs and quality of life (β = 0.163, p < 0.001). Furthermore, job demands are shown to moderate the relationship between FWAs and work-life balance (β = 0.15, p = 0.001). The findings have highlighted the need for flexible work arrangements that enhance women’s overall work-life integration and well-being.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J16, J22, J28, J81, I31
-
References36
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Moderating role of job demands in the relationship between flexible work arrangements and work-life balance
-
- Table 1. Demographic characteristics
- Table 2. Reliability and validity
- Table 3. HTMT results – Discriminant validity
- Table 4. Inner VIF for CMB
- Table 5. Hypotheses testing – Path coefficients
-
- Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345-376.
- Aman-Ullah, A., Ibrahim, H., Aziz, A., & Mehmood, W. (2024). Balancing is a necessity not leisure: A study on work–life balance witnessing healthcare sector of Pakistan. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(1), 127-147.
- Aura, N. A. M., & Desiana, P. M. (2023). Flexible working arrangements and work-family culture effects on job satisfaction: The mediation role of work-family conflicts among female employees. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan – Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 16(2), 381-398.
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Noba Scholar.
- Beauregard, T. A., & Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 9-22.
- Bharadwaj, S., Khan, N. A., & Yameen, M. (2022). Unbundling employer branding, job satisfaction, organizational identification and employee retention: A sequential mediation analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(3), 309-334.
- Clark, L. V., Fida, R., Skinner, J., Murdoch, J., Rees, N., Williams, J., Foster, T., & Sanderson, K. (2021). Mental health, well-being and support interventions for UK ambulance services staff: An evidence map, 2000 to 2020. British Paramedic Journal, 5(4), 25-39.
- Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations.
- Davidescu, A. A. M., Apostu, S. A., Paul, A., & Casuneanu, I. (2020). Work flexibility, job satisfaction, and job performance among romanian employees – Implications for sustainable human resource management. Sustainability, 12(15).
- Gašić, D., & Berber, N. (2023). The mediating role of employee engagement in the relationship between flexible work arrangements and turnover intentions among highly educated employees in the Republic of Serbia. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2).
- Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165-183). American Psychological Association.
- Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.
- Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510-531.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Hanklang, S., Ratanasiripong, P., Naksranoi, S., Sathira-Anant, S., & Patanasri, K. (2018). Quality of life and mental health among Thai older workers in community enterprises. Journal of Health Research, 32(3), 237-250.
- Hao, Y., Hao, J., & Wang, X. (2016). The relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction: Evidence from China. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 7(2), 115-128.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hwang, H., Hur, W. M., Shin, Y., & Paik, M. S. (2024). Work-from-home satisfaction and task crafting in South Korea: The roles of resilience and job tenure. Asia Pacific Business Review, 31(1), 157-179.
- Jiang, L., Pan, Z., Luo, Y., Guo, Z., & Kou, D. (2023). More flexible and more innovative: The impact of flexible work arrangements on the innovation behavior of knowledge employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
- Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
- Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347-367.
- Lekchiri, S., & Eversole, B. A. W. (2021). Perceived work-life balance: Exploring the experiences of professional Moroccan women. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(1), 35-53.
- Malik, S. A. (2015). Time pressure and challenge appraisal as predictors of job satisfaction: Empirical evidence from Pakistani universities. SAGE Open, 5(2).
- Ng, P. Y., & Clercq, D. De. (2021). Explaining the entrepreneurial intentions of employees: The roles of societal norms, work-related creativity and personal resources. International Small Business Journal, 39(8), 732-754.
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook (pp. 97-146). Springer.
- Palvimo, T., Vauhkonen, A., & Hult, M. (2023). The associations among destructive leadership, job demands and resources, and burnout among nurses: A cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Nursing Management.
- Rastogi, M., Rangnekar, S., & Rastogi, R. (2018). Enhancing quality of work life in India: The role of workplace flexibility. Industrial and Commercial Training, 50(5), 234-249.
- Sekhar, C., & Patwardhan, M. (2023). Flexible working arrangement and job performance: The mediating role of supervisor support. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(5), 1221-1238.
- Shirmohammadi, M., Au, W. C., & Beigi, M. (2022). Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 163-181.
- Stefana, E., Marciano, F., Rossi, D., Cocca, P., & Tomasoni, G. (2021). Composite indicators to measure quality of working life in Europe: A systematic review. Social Indicators Research, 157, 1047-1078.
- Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71-97.
- Wang, L., & Xie, T. (2023). Double-edged sword effect of flexible work arrangements on employee innovation performance: From the demands–resources–individual effects perspective. Sustainability, 15(13).
- Wang, S., & Cheng, C. (2024). Opportunity or exploitation? A longitudinal dyadic analysis of flexible working arrangements and gender household labor inequality. Social Forces, 102(4), 1446-1466.
- Yusaini, M. H., bin Hassan, M. A., Hasnisham, Q. M., bin Baker, R., & Kelana, B. W. Y. (2023). Flexible work arrangements: Experience of a malaysian manufacturing company. NUST Business Review, 4(2).