E-government development: Artificial intelligence vibrancy and readiness as drivers of digital public administration
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(1).2026.43
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #1, pp. 649-672
- 17 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is shaping digital governance, with global organizations emphasizing its opportunities and risks for public administration. The study aims to assess whether advancements in AI, measured by the AI Vibrancy Score (AIVS) and the Government AI Readiness Index (GAIRI), drive improvements in the E-Government Development Index (EGDI). Using panel data methods, the analysis draws on data from 36 countries for 2018–2022 (AIVS–EGDI) and 170 countries for 2020–2024 (GAIRI–EGDI), due to differing data availability and indicator coverage periods, applying fixed effects, random effects, and Mundlak specifications, combined with robust inference techniques. The results demonstrate that within-country improvements in AI readiness are positively and robustly associated with higher levels of e-government development, with the FE estimate for the Government AI Readiness Index equal to 0.17 (p < 0.001). RE models reveal stronger cross-country correlations, with coefficients of 2.55 (p < 0.001) for the AI Vibrancy Score and 0.35 (p < 0.001) for AI readiness. However, Mundlak (correlated RE) specifications indicate that the between-country components are statistically insignificant. Yet, the within-country effects remain significant, suggesting that dynamic national reforms and policy-driven progress outweigh inherited structural advantages. Time effects are pronounced, with positive and significant shifts in 2020 (+7.02) and 2022 (+8.10) relative to the baseline year, reflecting the acceleration of digital public administration during the post-pandemic period. Country-specific effects exhibit substantial heterogeneity, ranging from strongly positive deviations (e.g., Denmark, Estonia, Korea) to persistently negative ones (e.g., India, South Africa), underscoring the uneven national trajectories. Robustness checks using clustered standard errors confirm the stability of all key coefficients.
Acknowledgment
This paper was prepared based on the results of a study funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine entitled “Digitalization of the public-private partnership system as a driver of the state’s economic security in the war and post-war periods” (registration number: 0126U000543).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H83, O33, O38, C23
-
References56
-
Tables14
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the dataset
- Table 2. Results of FE and RE estimations
- Table 3. RE estimation with cluster-robust standard errors
- Table 4. Correlated RE (Mundlak specification)
- Table 5. Country-specific effects (uᵢ) from the Mundlak correlated random effects model
- Table 6. Mundlak correlated random effects model with time effects
- Table 7. Country-specific intercepts (αᵢ) from the Mundlak correlated random effects model
- Table 8. Descriptive statistics of the dataset GARI and EGDI
- Table 9. FE and RE estimations with cluster-robust standard errors
- Table 10. Mundlak specifications (FE and RE) with cluster-robust standard errors
- Table 11. Countries with the highest and lowest country effects (uᵢ)
- Table 12. Countries with the highest and lowest fixed effects (αᵢ)
- Table B1. Country-specific effects (uᵢ) from the Mundlak correlated random effects model
- Table B2. Country fixed effects (αᵢ) from the panel model
-
- Abou-Moghli, A. (2026). Sustainable digital transformation in the energy sector: The role of artificial intelligence training in achieving Jordan’s green growth strategy. Environmental Economics, 17(1), 1-11.
- Androniceanu, A. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, present and perspectives in public administration. Administratie si Management Public, 43(43), 105-119.
- Bashynska, I. (2025). Ethical aspects of AI use in the circular economy AI & Society, 41, 575-593.
- Bondar, K., Tolchieva, H., Bilyk, M., Slavkova, O., & Symonov, V. (2024). The role of digitisation in management and strategic decision-making in modern management. Financial and Credit Activity, 2(55), 214-227.
- Bouguerroumi, H., & Belarbi, Y. (2025). Cyclicality and economic growth dynamics: Business cycles’ typologization, dating, and matching with oil price fluctuations. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(1), 59-73.
- Dabija, D. C., & Frau, M. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence in marketing: Trend or the new normal? Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(4), 1173-1181.
- Dener, C. (2022). Govtech Maturity Index (GTMI) 2022 update: Trends in public sector digital transformation. World Bank Group.
- El Massaoudi, E. M., El Hammoumi, A., Seghyar, N., & El Ouali, A. (2025). Digital transformation and improvement of management control: Empirical study in financial institutions. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 22(3), 455-469.
- European Commission. (2023a). eGovernment Benchmark 2023. Shaping Europe’s digital future.
- European Commission. (2023b). Europe’s Digital Decade: digital targets for 2030 – Documents.
- Haley, P. (2025). Artificial intelligence and ethical dimensions of automated traffic enforcement: Implications for public health, healthcare equity, and social justice. Health Economics and Management Review, 6(2), 32-49.
- Haley, P., & Burrell, D. N. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into law enforcement: Socioeconomic and ethical challenges. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(2), 60-77.
- Höller, S., Dilger, T., Spiess, T., Ploder, C., & Bernsteiner, R. (2023). Awareness of unethical artificial intelligence and its mitigation measures. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 15(2), 67-89.
- Ganushchak, I., Bashynska, I., Ognjanovic, I., Duda, J., & Kusa, R. (2025). AI-driven approaches to bridging the digital divide and advancing smart circular enterprises. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems.
- Georgieva, K. (2024, January 14). AI will transform the global economy. Let us make sure it benefits humanity. IMF.
- Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., Kamiński, K., Konopczyński, F., Ładna, A., Nafradi, B., Rosłaniec, K., & Troszyński, M. (2025). Generative AI and jobs: A refined global index of occupational exposure (ILO Working Paper 140). Geneva: ILO.
- Golubtsov, D., Kedziora, J., Kozhakhmetova, A., & Kedziora, D. (2025). Assessing the impact of digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) on the efficiency of supply chain. Economics and Sociology, 18(1), 149-173.
- Iuga, I. C., & Socol, A. (2024). Government artificial intelligence readiness and brain drain: Influencing factors and spatial effects in European Union member states. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 25(2), 268-296.
- Jarzębowski, S., Bozhenko, V., Didorenko, K., Tkachenko, O., Blyznyukov, A., Melnyk, M., & Cieslik, J. (2024). The impact of digitalisation on the competitiveness of European countries. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(3), 238-261.
- Khaddam, A., & Alhanatleh, H. (2024). Role of artificial intelligence and big data capabilities on fintech services: Value co-creation theory. Innovative Marketing, 20(4), 219-233.
- Khrais, L. (2025). Bridging gaps in InsurTech and e-commerce integration: Insights from Saudi Arabia. Insurance Markets and Companies, 16(1), 64-73.
- Kildei, A., Tumpach, M., & Shafranova, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence for smart customer feedback management: Improving content analysis approaches. Knowledge Economy and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), 48-65.
- Kirichok, O., Orlovska, Y., Zhanseitova, G., Oriekhova, A., Babaiev, D., Havrylenko, O., & Vasylieva, T. (2025). Bridging digital innovation and energy justice: The role of artificial intelligence in advancing energy equity. Environmental Economics, 16(4), 166-181.
- Kozhushko, I. (2023). Transformation of financial services industry in conditions of digitalization of economy. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(4), 189-200.
- Kritikos, I., Sarantopoulos, A., Roumeliotis, A., Vasiliades, J., & Matsinas, I. (2025). Unlocking the potential of artificial intelligence in pharma research and development: insights from investor and researcher perspectives. Health Economics and Management Review, 6(2), 1-16.
- Kusairi, S., Wong, Z. Y., Wahyuningtyas, R., & Sukemi, M. N. (2023). Impact of digitalisation and foreign direct investment on economic growth: Learning from developed countries. Journal of International Studies, 16(1), 98-111.
- Kuzior, A., Marszałek-Kotzur, I., Kurovska, Y., & Chvankin, Y. (2024). The role of digital economy in transformation of public health: Modeling and analysis. Health Economics and Management Review, 5(4), 91-109.
- Kuzior, A., Bielialov, T., Morozova, O., Vasiltsova, O., Rubanov, P., Holub, I., & Lyeonov, S. (2025). Does a country’s energy security increase with advances in government AI readiness? An empirical panel study. Environmental Economics, 16(4), 182-196.
- Kytsak, T., & Ovsiannykov, D. (2025). Working hours of the future: AI technologies, collective synergy, and biorhythms as the foundation for productive work. Social and Labour Relations: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 1-10.
- Lazaroiu, G., & Rogalska, E. (2023). How generative artificial intelligence technologies shape partial job displacement and labor productivity growth. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 703-706.
- Lazaroiu, G., Gedeon, T., Valaskova, K., Vrbka, J., Šuleř, P., Zvarikova, K., Kramarova, K., Rowland, Z., Stehel, V., Gajanova, L., Horák, J., Grupac, M., Caha, Z., Blazek, R., Kovalova, E., & Nagy, M. (2024). Cognitive digital twin-based Internet of Robotic Things, multi-sensory extended reality and simulation modeling technologies, and generative artificial intelligence and cyber–physical manufacturing systems in the immersive industrial metaverse. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(3), 719-748.
- Lyeonov, S., Draskovic, V., Kubaščikova, Z., & Fenyves, V. (2024). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in combating illegal financial operations: Bibliometric analysis. Human Technology, 20(2), 325-360.
- Lyeonov, S., Hrytsenko, L., Trojanek, R., & Popp, J. (2025). Who benefits from AI in money laundering in Europe: The organised criminals or the AML services? Human Technology, 21(1), 222-245.
- Mahmoud, M., Shma, T., Aziz, A., & Awad, A. (2025). Integrating knowledge management with smart technologies in public pharmaceutical organizations. Knowledge and Performance Management, 9(1), 31-44.
- Masyk, M., Buryk, Z., Radchenko, O., Saienko, V., & Dziurakh, Y. (2023). Criteria for governance’ institutional effectiveness and quality in the context of sustainable development tasks. International Journal for Quality Research, 17(2), 501-514.
- Máté, D., Raza, H., Ahmad, I., & Kovács, S. (2024). Next step for Bitcoin: Confluence of technical indicators and machine learning. Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 68-94.
- Mura, L., & Stehlíková, B. (2025). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Safeguarding human dignity, social justice and environmental stability in the age of AI. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(2), 479-507.
- Murko, E., Babšek, M., & Aristovnik, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and public governance models in socioeconomic welfare: some insights from Slovenia. Administratie si Management Public, 43(43), 41-60.
- Othman, M. (2025). AI and FinTech adoption in Jordanian banking: Toward inclusive and culturally aligned innovation. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(4), 45-59.
- Oxford Insights. (n.d.). Government AI Readiness Index.
- Panasiuk, O., & Kravchuk, O. (2025). The impact of digitalization on strategic human resource management: Global and national context. Social and Labour Relations: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 30-44.
- Pilelienė, L., & Bogoyavlenska, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence in influencer marketing: Current researchscape, trends and insights from a bibliometric review. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(2), 583-611.
- Polishchuk, Y. (2023). Fintech future trends. In J. Lubacha, B. Mäihäniemi, & R. Wisła (Eds.), The European digital economy: Drivers of digital transition and economic recovery (pp. 204-220). Routledge.
- Roieva, O., Oneshko, S., Sulima, N., Saienko, V., & Makurin, A. (2023). Identification of digitalization as a direction of innovative development of modern enterprise. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 312-325.
- Salnikova, O., Rodchenko, L., Bielialov, T., Skrypnyk, M., Ivanchenkova, L., & Slobodianiuk, O. (2019). Matrix approach to risk management in the national security system, highlighting the criteria for choosing the optimal strategy for decision making. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 2407-2411.
- Schinello, S. (2025). Challenges and opportunities in using artificial intelligence in creative economy: Insights from expert interviews. Economics and Sociology, 18(1), 199-216.
- Stanford University. (n.d.). Global AI vibrancy tool – AI index. Stanford University Human-Centred Artificial Intelligence.
- Stender, S., Bulkot, O., Iastremska, O., Saienko, V., & Pereguda, Y. (2024). Digital transformation of the national economy of Ukraine: challenges and opportunities. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(55), 333-345.
- United Nations. (n.d.). Data centre.
- Ustik, T., Karmazinova, V., Shurpa, S., Zhuk, O., & Boiko, O. (2023). The impact of digitalization on marketing communications: New challenges for branding and advertising business. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 20, 344-355.
- Wang, X., Wang, K., Safi, A., & Umar, M. (2025). How is artificial intelligence technology transforming energy security? New evidence from global supply chains. Oeconomia Copernicana, 2025(16), 15-38.
- World Bank. (2024). Digital Progress and Trends Report 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- World Bank Group. (2024). Global Trends in AI Governance: Evolving Country Approaches. World Bank.
- Yarovenko, H., Horbachova, O., Bylbas, R., & Latysh, D. (2025b). Digitalization as a socio-economic challenge: Modeling the impact on the level of cybercrime considering socio-economic, technological and institutional factors. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(2), 282-315.
- Yarovenko, H., Kuzior, A., Norek, T., & Lopatka, A. (2024a). The future of artificial intelligence: Fear, hope or indifference? Human Technology, 20(3), 611-639.
- Yarovenko, H., Pozovna, I., & Bylbas, R. (2024b). The risk of escalating cyberattacks and financial fraud during wartime: The maturity of the county’s judicial system in combating cyber and financial crimes. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 8(4), 126-147.


