Issue #3 (Volume 14 2025)

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study aims to examine the interrelation between public budgeting transparency, public participation, government regulation, local government financial capacity, and public trust in shaping local government accountability in heritage asset management. The study focuses on West Sumatra, Indonesia, where local governments play a crucial role in preserving cultural heritage assets. The sample included 250 local government employees actively engaged in heritage asset management. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire between March and June 2024, with responses analyzed using WarpPLS. The study rigorously adheres to ethical principles to protect the participants and ensure the integrity of the research process. Results indicate that public budgeting transparency (β = 0.165, p = 0.003) and local government financial capacity (β = 0.143, p = 0.004) both directly and indirectly, via mediating public trust, influence local government accountability (β = 0.193, p = 0.003). Government regulation (β = –0.012, p = 0.433) was not found to have any direct significant impact on accountability. On the other hand, public trust and government regulatory systems have a strong direct relationship with local government accountability but a weak indirect relationship through public trust, which makes governance mechanisms pretty complex. Public trust plays a vital role in connecting transparency, financial resilience, and accountability to the legitimacy of enforcement and effective governance. The findings underscore the significance of integrating trust-building measures, transparency, and financial capacity for governance frameworks to ensure equitable and sustainable heritage asset management.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This paper investigates the determinants of local public investment in Morocco, a country undergoing decentralization and facing persistent regional disparities. The study aims to identify the key factors driving capital expenditure across Morocco’s 12 regions and their local governments, including regional, provincial, and municipal councils, from 2017 to 2024. A dynamic panel of 96 observations is constructed, and a generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator is applied to address endogeneity, control for regional fixed effects, and account for the temporal persistence of investment. The choice of GMM is supported by prior descriptive analysis and the absence of spatial autocorrelation, confirmed by Moran’s I test. The results show that financial resources play a central role in shaping regional investment levels. Specifically, both own-source revenues and central government transfers have a positive and statistically significant effect on investment, with elasticities of 0.43 and 1.35, respectively. Public debt also contributes positively (0.21%), suggesting its potential as a complementary financing tool. In contrast, personnel expenditure exerts a crowding-out effect (−0.48%), reducing the fiscal space available for investment. Other operating expenditures and regional population show no significant impact. The model is robust (R² = 0.757) and satisfies the Hansen test (p = 0.095). Overall, the findings highlight the decisive role of financial autonomy and the effectiveness of intergovernmental transfers in enhancing the investment capacity of local governments. The results also call for better management of operating expenses to avoid limiting capital investment potential.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of budgetary participation, organizational commitment, motivation, and budget transparency on local government performance, with psychological capital as a moderating variable. Budgetary participation refers to the involvement of local government employees in the budgeting process, while psychological capital reflects their optimism, resilience, and confidence in decision-making. This analysis was conducted in Central Java, Indonesia, from June to August 2024 using a quantitative approach. A structured survey was conducted by distributing questionnaires to respondents consisting of 250 employees in local work units involved in financial management, policy implementation, and service provision. After being selected based on their professional knowledge and direct involvement in the governance and budgeting process, 221 respondents were considered valid. Strict ethical guidelines were adhered to in order to protect participants and maintain the integrity of the research process. The results show that budget transparency and motivation significantly improve government performance. Thus, both are important in the governance process. Psychological capital strengthens the influence of budgetary participation, organizational commitment, and budget transparency on local government performance. Motivation has a direct and substantial contribution to local government performance without being moderated by employee psychological traits such as optimism and self-confidence. Employees' motivation drives their performance regardless of their psychological capital. This is in contrast to budgetary participation and organizational commitment, which require psychological support to enhance their effects. This study contributes to governance research in highlighting the psychological aspects of budgetary participation, organizational commitment, and transparency.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study examines the impact of budget planning, participation, and internal control on preventing fraud in the budget and testing the mediating role of effective budgetary policy. A quantitative research approach was carried out in which a structured survey was administered to 178 heads of work units in local government agencies of 14 districts in East Java Province, Indonesia. These respondents were purposively sampled, considering their active role in the budget preparation, to enhance data relevance and reliability. The data collection period was from February to March 2025. The study adheres to rigorous ethical standards to protect human participants and the integrity of the research process. The study found that budget participation is the most significant variable for fraud prevention (β = .747, p < 0.001), followed by budget planning (β = 0.147, p = .017). Internal control and budget policy had no direct effect on fraud prevention. Notably, budget policy had a significant mediation effect between each predictor and fraud prevention, particularly for budget planning (indirect effect β = .352, p < 0.001). The results indicate that fraud prevention can best occur using participatory practices and planning that are contained within a strong, enforceable budgetary policy. It is suggested that there should be institutionalized budget systems with integrated governance systems to facilitate financial integrity.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
The study provides a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of municipal budget allocation efficiency in Portugal over the period 2018–2022, based on a comparative and longitudinal analysis of financial data from 308 municipalities. Efficiency was assessed by examining the alignment between budget forecasts and actual financial execution. The results show that 77.6% of municipalities (n = 239) were classified as efficient in 2018, increasing to 82.1% (n = 253) in 2019 and 83.1% (n = 256) in 2020. However, a downward trend followed, with efficiency declining to 74.0% (n = 228) in 2021 and 73.7% (n = 227) in 2022. Over the five-year period, the average efficiency rate across all municipalities was 78.1%. In contrast, 21.9% of municipalities on average (ranging from 16.9% to 26.3%) consistently demonstrated inefficiencies in budget preparation and execution. The study identifies key contributing factors to inefficiency, including political interference, reliance on incremental budgeting approaches, and limited technical forecasting capacity. The data reveal persistent discrepancies between budgeted allocations and actual service demand, leading to resource misallocation and reduced fiscal credibility. Statistical patterns also indicate that municipalities with higher population densities and more diversified revenue sources tended to perform better in efficiency metrics. The findings support the conclusion that the adoption of rigorous, data-driven forecasting methodologies significantly improves financial planning outcomes and institutional trust. These results offer evidence-based recommendations for refining municipal financial management practices, particularly in settings subject to political and economic volatility.

Acknowledgment
This article is financed by Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal [Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal].

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
As governments worldwide intensify efforts to achieve decarbonization, the role of fiscal and public policy instruments in shaping energy transitions has gained critical importance. This study evaluates how budgetary measures, taxation schemes, subsidies, and regulatory standards influence renewable electricity outcomes, thereby linking climate policy design with broader public and municipal finance issues. The analysis relies on panel data from 48 OECD, OECD negotiating members, and OECD participating partner-countries between 2009 and 2022, estimated with fixed and random effects models in R Studio and tested for robustness using Driscoll-Kraay and cluster-robust standard errors. The findings indicate that, compared with other instruments, feed-in tariffs (β = 0.116, p < 0.001), planning for renewables expansion (β = 0.070, p < 0.01), and air emission standards (β = 0.170, p < 0.001) provide the strongest and most consistent support for renewable electricity development. Renewable energy certificates and auctions also contribute positively, though with weaker statistical significance, while fossil fuel excise taxes and coal bans display mixed or context-dependent effects. The adjusted R² of 0.38 for renewable electricity generation and 0.44 for renewable electricity supply demonstrates the explanatory relevance of the selected policy variables. Robustness checks further confirm the enduring importance of feed-in tariffs as a cornerstone of fiscal support for renewables. Finally, cross-country heterogeneity is evident, with strong positive random effects in Bulgaria (0.86), Slovenia (0.73), and Czechia (0.81), and pronounced negative effects in Saudi Arabia (–1.23), Costa Rica (–1.22), and Chile (–0.95).

Acknowledgment
This study was prepared as part of the project 101127491-EnergyS4UA-ERASMUS-JMO2023-HEI-TCH-RSCH and as part of the project “From Dependency to Resilience: Renewable Energy Transformation in Post-Soviet States – A Multi-Level Analysis of Key Drivers of Success” within the Philipp Schwartz Initiative, funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. However, views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Education and Culture Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The authors are thankful to the Silesian University of Technology and the National Scholarship Programme of the Slovak Republic for their support in carrying out this research.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Fiscal structural reforms play a decisive role in strengthening macroeconomic stability, enhancing public sector efficiency, and improving institutional resilience in transition economies. Armenia represents a particularly relevant case, where successive reform waves have been closely linked to external adjustment programs and domestic political cycles. The purpose of this study is to measure the intensity of fiscal reforms in Armenia and to evaluate their dynamics over the period 1995–2024. For this purpose, a Fiscal Structural Reform Index (FSRI) is constructed, integrating revenue, expenditure, and institutional reforms based on IMF MONA benchmark data. Reforms are coded by significance (0.25 = minor, 0.50 = medium, 1.00 = major), adjusted for persistence through a geometric decay factor (0.8), and aggregated using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The first principal component explains 71.2% of the total variance, ensuring the robustness of the composite index. The results indicate that reform intensity in Armenia exhibits a cyclical pattern, peaking during IMF-supported programs in 1999–2001, 2009–2011, and 2016–2018, and moderating during periods of political transition. Institutional reforms display the highest persistence, accounting for the largest share of the index, while revenue and expenditure reforms are more episodic. The analysis demonstrates that both external conditionality and internal political shifts strongly influence reform momentum. The FSRI provides a replicable framework for tracking fiscal reform intensity, supporting policy design, and strengthening structural diagnostics in transition and developing economies.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This paper aims to examine the influence of fiscal decentralization, budget governance, and budget allocation on financial performance and their implications on public welfare in the local governments of Indonesian districts (regencies) and municipalities (cities). Panel data were collected from 514 district and municipal governments across 34 provinces. Purposive sampling resulted in 225 audited financial reports from 2018 to 2022. The data analysis employed descriptive statistics, correlation tests, and panel regression. Model selection was conducted using the Chow test, and all analyses were performed in EViews. The results showed that only three of the eight hypotheses were supported. Fiscal decentralization has a negative impact on both budget allocation and financial performance, with no significant effect on public welfare. Budget governance demonstrates a dual effect: it significantly reduces budget allocation but enhances both financial performance and public welfare. While budget allocation positively influences financial performance, this improvement paradoxically reduces public welfare. These findings suggest that fiscal autonomy alone is insufficient to improve welfare outcomes. Instead, effective budget governance and equitable allocation mechanisms are essential.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
The growing number of internally displaced persons (IDPs), combined with challenges in financing social programs during wartime, highlights the importance of ensuring the effectiveness of public spending. This paper aims to examine the effectiveness of state programs supporting IDPs in terms of their alignment with the target group’s needs. The assessment was conducted based on data from a nationally representative sociological survey of IDPs. The analysis of the effectiveness of the housing assistance program for IDPs was conducted using elasticity coefficients that consider price growth and changes in the subsistence minimum. According to IDPs’ assessment, most programs funded from the state budget meet current needs and are rated above the average level, above 2.5 points out of 5. Programs of legal and informational support (3.8), cash assistance (4.3), access to medical care without restrictions (i.e., the requirement to sign a declaration) (3.4), provision of social housing (3.3), and tax deductions under rental agreements (3.2) are considered highly relevant. Low relevance was assigned to assistance with relocating businesses (1.7), grant support for starting a business (2.2), housing loans (2.2), and vocational training through referrals from the State Employment Service (2.4). Conclusions were drawn about the need for periodic monitoring of IDP needs and analyzing the effectiveness of funding while considering price changes and the subsidence minimum. This approach could be used to support decisions regarding the attraction of alternative sources of financing for social programs when state budget funding is insufficient to cover basic living needs of IDPs.

Acknowledgment
This study is supported by the National Research Foundation of Ukraine under the project No.2021.01/0343 “Ensuring social protection of ATO / JFO participants and social integration of IDP under the condition of increasing threats to social security”.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Electricity energy consumption plays a significant role in both local and international financial development. However, an imbalance between demand and supply of energy, especially electricity, impedes financial performance on both national and local levels. The purpose of this study is to investigate the dynamic impact of load shedding on financial performance in KwaZulu-Natal. A panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model, the Toda-Yamamoto Granger causality test, and Error Correction Model (ECM) approaches were applied to a data sample from seven district municipalities for a period from 2016 to 2022. The results reveal an inverse long-term relationship between load shedding and municipal financial performance. Additionally, the Toda-Yamamoto causality analysis indicates a short-run bidirectional causality between load shedding and financial performance. This implies that a high level of electricity cuts leads to poor financial performance. Based on these findings, the study recommends that the government and policymakers implement strategies to improve electricity generation and distribution, and foster a more competitive energy market by allowing the entry of multiple electricity producers beyond Eskom. Furthermore, it advocates for increased investment in alternative energy sources such as solar, wind, and biogas as a means to mitigate load shedding and its adverse effects.