Attractiveness of the Lithuanian Armed Forces as an employer: An empirical perspective from the military sector
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(4).2025.25
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #4, pp. 341-353
- 16 Views
-
4 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Nowadays, the challenge of increasing personnel retention by aligning organizational values with the expectations of active-duty soldiers remains relevant in the Lithuanian Armed Forces. Using the parallel mediation modeling method, this study focuses on the value of interest as a symbolic component of employer attractiveness, reflecting the perception of meaningful, intellectually engaging, and purposeful work. The research hypotheses are tested using a sample of 276 Lithuanian active-duty soldiers. The mediation effects are checked using PROCESS v3.5 and bootstrap 5000. The results show that the value of interest significantly predicts the perception of four main employer attributes: social, economic, developmental, and application values. The validated theoretical framework showed that symbolic perceptions shape several aspects of employer attractiveness. Furthermore, the study shows that developmental value and economic value significantly mediated the relationship between interest value and intention to continue serving, demonstrating that symbolic engagement alone is not sufficient, as soldiers are more likely to remain in service when clear career growth opportunities and adequate financial rewards reinforce such engagement. Conversely, social and applied values did not show a significant mediating effect, suggesting that they are less important in shaping long-term decisions about personnel retention in the military. Overall, the findings offer practical implications for employer branding and human resources strategies, highlighting the need to integrate both symbolic meaning and instrumental benefits to meet the evolving expectations of military personnel.
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania for financial support in publishing this article.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, M53, H56
-
References40
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. The modeling results based on unstandardized coefficients
-
- Table 1. Preliminary analysis results
- Table 2. The effect of interest value (INT) individually evaluated by regression models
- Table 3. Regression model parameters with the intention to serve in the Lithuanian Armed Forces as an outcome variable
- Table 4. The total, direct, and indirect effects of INT on SER
- Table A1. Sociodemographic profiles of active-duty soldiers who participated in the research
- Table A2. Background information on the variables included in the study
-
- Alshathry, S., Clarke, M., & Goodman, S. (2017). The role of employer brand equity in employee attraction and retention: A unified framework. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(3), 413-431.
- Alves, P., Santos, V., Reis, I., Martinho, F., Martinho, D., Correia Sampaio, M., José Sousa, M., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2020). Strategic talent management: The impact of employer branding on the affective commitment of employees. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 9993.
- Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501-517.
- Bakanauskienė, I., & Barkauskė, L. (2021). Patrauklus darbdavys: IT sektoriaus darbuotojų požiūrio Lietuvos tyrimas [Attractive employer: Lithuanian study of IT sector employee attitudes]. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 34(2), 6-17. (In Lithuanian).
- Bakanauskienė, I., Bendaravičienė, R., & Barkauskė, L. (2017). Features of Employer Attractiveness on Lithuanian Business Organizations: Employees’ Perceptions. Organizacijų Vadyba: Sisteminiai Tyrimai, 77, 7-23. (In Lithuanian).
- Bekesiene, S., & Smaliukienė, R. (2022). Personal growth under stress: Mediating effects of unit cohesion and leadership during mandatory military training. Sustainability, 14(16), Article 10389.
- Bekesiene, S., Kanapeckaitė, R., Smaliukienė, R., Navickienė, O., Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I., & Vaičaitienė, R. (2022). Sustainable reservists’ services: The effect of resilience on the intention to remain in the active military reserve using a parallel mediating model. Sustainability, 14(19), Article 12048.
- Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151-172.
- Buitek, E. K., Kaliyeva, S. A., Turginbayeva, A. N., Meldakhanova, M. K., & Shaikh, A. A. (2025). How much does an employer’s attractiveness matter to youth employment? Evidence from a developing country. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 17(1), 258-283.
- Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. Routledge.
- Cannon, S. M., & Kreutzer, K. (2018). Mission accomplished? Organizational identity work in response to mission success. Human Relations, 71(9), 1234-1263.
- Dassler, A., Khapova, S. N., Lysova, E. I., & Korotov, K. (2022). Employer attractiveness from an employee perspective: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 858217.
- de Waal, A. (2022). Measuring organizational attractiveness. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 9(1), 1-20.
- Eger, L., Mičík, M., Gangur, M., & Řehor, P. (2019). Employer branding: exploring attractiveness dimensions in a multicultural context. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(3), 519-541.
- Friebel, G., Heinz, M., Hoffman, M., & Zubanov, N. (2023). What do employee referral programs do? Measuring the direct and overall effects of a management practice. Journal of Political Economy, 131(3), 633-686.
- Gomes, D. R., Ribeiro, N., & Santos, M. J. (2023). “Searching for gold” with sustainable human resources management and internal communication: Evaluating the mediating role of employer attractiveness for explaining turnover intention and performance. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), Article 24.
- Hayes, A. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
- Kalinska-Kula, M., & Staniec, I. (2021). Employer branding and organizational attractiveness: Current employees’ perspective. European Research Studies Journal, 24(1), 583-603.
- Kanapeckaitė, R., Bekesiene, S., & Bagdžiūnienė, D. (2022). Reserve soldiers’ psychological resilience impact to sustainable military competences: On the mediating role of psychological skills (effort, self-efficacy, proactivity). Sustainability, 14(11), Article 6810.
- Kanwal, H., & van Hoye, G. (2023). Beyond employer brand content: The role of employer brand process attributes in understanding employees’ reactions toward employer. Human Resource Management, 63(1), 67-86.
- Kanwal, H., & Van Hoye, G. (2024). Beyond employer brand content: The role of employer brand process attributes in understanding employees’ reactions toward their employer. Human Resource Management, 63(1), 67-86.
- Kaur, R., & Shah, R. (2020). Employer branding at armed forces: Current and potential employees’ perspective. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9), 798-819.
- Kilson, G. A. (2025). Optimizing employee attraction and retention in hospitality and tourism: A systematic review of employer branding research. Administrative Sciences, 15(5), Article 153.
- Kouamé, S., Hafsi, T., Oliver, D., & Langley, A. (2022). Creating and sustaining stakeholder emotional resonance with organizational identity in social mission-driven organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 65(6), 1864-1893.
- Kumari, S., & Saini, G. K. (2018). Do instrumental and symbolic factors interact in influencing employer attractiveness and job pursuit intention? Career Development International, 23(5), 444-462.
- Kurek, D. (2022). Attractiveness of the Polish army as an employer: Results of empirical research. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology – Organization and Management Series, 164, 201-214.
- Leitão, J., Pereira, D., & Gonçalves, Â. (2019). Quality of work life and organizational performance: Workers’ feelings of contributing, or not, to the organization’s productivity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20).
- Lievens, F. (2007). Employer branding in the Belgian Army: The importance of instrumental and symbolic beliefs for potential applicants, actual applicants, and military employees. Human Resource Management, 46(1), 51-69.
- Lievens, F., & Slaughter, J. E. (2016). Employer image and employer branding: What we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 407-440.
- Mainali, S. P., & Tantry, A. (2022). Employment retention: Active employee engagement, employee satisfaction and leadership factors of a successful human resource strategic practices in an organization. Westford Research Journal, 6(2).
- Maurya, K. K., & Agarwal, M. (2018). Organisational talent management and perceived employer branding. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(2), 312-330.
- Monteiro, B., Santos, V., Reis, I., Sampaio, M. C., Sousa, B., Martinho, F., José Sousa, M., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2020). Employer Branding Applied to SMEs: A Pioneering Model Proposal for Attracting and Retaining Talent. Information, 11(12), Article 574.
- Moser, K., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2021). What is the right mix? Toward a compensatory theory of employer attractiveness. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021(1).
- Pareek, A., Mohanty, S. S., & Mangaraj, S. (2019). Systematic review on employee engagement and its impact on employee retention. Training & Development Journal, 10(2), 125-133.
- Sandeepanie, M. H. R., Gamage, P., Perera, G. D. N., & Sajeewani, T. L. (2023). The role of talent management and employee psychological contract on employer branding: A pragmatic conceptual model. Management Research Review, 46(2), 196-222.
- Santiago, J. (2019). The relationship between brand attractiveness and the intent to apply for a job: A millennials’ perspective. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28(2), 142-157.
- Schwaiger, K., Zehrer, A., & Spiess, T. (2022). The influence of symbolic and instrumental attributes of employer image on perceived industry attractiveness: Differences between business owners and employees. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 5(3), 567-587.
- Silva, A. J., & Dias, H. (2023). The relationship between employer branding, corporate reputation and intention to apply to a job offer. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(8), 1-16.
- Smaliukienė, R., Bekesiene, S., Kanapeckaitė, R., Navickienė, O., Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I., & Vaičaitienė, R. (2023). Meaning in military service among reservists: Measuring the effect of prosocial motivation in a moderated-mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1082685.
- Theurer, C. P., Tumasjan, A., Welpe, I. M., & Lievens, F. (2018). Employer branding: A brand equity-based literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 155-179.


